According to André Dragosch, the debate around Bitcoin being a 'ponzi scheme' is countered by referencing historical changes in the global monetary system. Dragosch highlights the years 1915 and 1971, implying significant shifts in monetary policy that might parallel current digital currency trends. This historical context may influence traders' perceptions and strategies regarding Bitcoin's long-term potential as an asset class.

According to ZachXBT, there is a cryptic reference to an account or individual named @ponzisaur, suggesting potential involvement in a Ponzi scheme or fraudulent activity. The tweet includes an image, but without further context, it raises questions about the legitimacy or activities of @ponzisaur. Traders should be cautious and conduct further research before engaging with entities associated with this name.

According to ZachXBT, he will not investigate a scheme that advertises 1% daily and 3500% annual returns, labeling it as an obvious Ponzi scheme and unsustainable.